Another stunner was entered by the crypto request when it was still suffering from FTX and Luna crashes. On Wednesday, 23rd November 2022, News surged that further than 10k BTC was transferred from 7 times old failed BTC- e Exchange to HitBTC. You might suppose that what's the relationship between transferring 10k Bitcoins and a bearish request? But there's bone
%20(1).png "7-year-old 10,000 BTC moved Sign of Danger in Bitcoin Market")
That's more dangerous than you can imagine.
%20(1).png "7-year-old 10,000 BTC moved Sign of Danger in Bitcoin Market")
to crypto experts when such a large quantum of BTC is transferred at formerly, they try to vend them at formerly and if they do it this time, the BTC request may fall below$ 10k. This would be more dangerous than utmost people can indeed suppose of. still, you may argue that why would they do this at 16k BTC while they had ample occasion during the bull run, 30- 69k?
The answer is simple if they vend at a$ 16k price they will still get further than 55X profit because these coins were bought in Jan 2015 when the price of BTC was a bare$ 297. And the moment it stands at$ 16k which is approx. PnL is 594. The news of these transferred Bitcoins came to the spotlight when two unidentified accounts transferred 10k BTC worth 165 million bones
from BTC- e
That couldn't be linked to any given custodial service
The answer is simple if they vend at a$ 16k price they will still get further than 55X profit because these coins were bought in Jan 2015 when the price of BTC was a bare$ 297. And the moment it stands at$ 16k which is approx. PnL is 594. The news of these transferred Bitcoins came to the spotlight when two unidentified accounts transferred 10k BTC worth 165 million bones
from BTC- e
Timing of transaction
The timing of the sale is veritably critical because the crypto assiduity is suffering from the rearmost debacles of the FTX and Luna crash and it might affect the overall sentiments of the crypto druggies and investors. In this case, 300 bitcoins were transferred from a portmanteau that entered,500 to another portmanteau around 0838 UTC. Those finances were resolved further and landed in several holdallsThat couldn't be linked to any given custodial service
Still, there's another auspicious group of investors and crypto druggies that view this sale from another perspective. The portmanteau proprietor may have transferred the plutocrat directly to the portmanteau a person can deposit the plutocrat into another portmanteau of their own, shoot it to another existent, or cash out through an unofficial untoward broker. The remaining,500 stayed put.
The same sentiments were participated by a crypto stoner on Twitter and the founder and CEO ofcryptoquant.com, Ki Young Ju replied that “ I’m not saying they’re going to vend all those 10k Bitcoins. We have no way to know when they will vend the rest of the BTC. What we do know is that 10k BTC was moved by culprits and could be implicit sell-side liquidity since they transferred 0.6 of their means to exchanges. ”
Also, he prompted the HitBTC platform to suspend the sale of these unidentified accounts to put a hold on further selling of these Bitcoins.
The same sentiments were participated by a crypto stoner on Twitter and the founder and CEO ofcryptoquant.com, Ki Young Ju replied that “ I’m not saying they’re going to vend all those 10k Bitcoins. We have no way to know when they will vend the rest of the BTC. What we do know is that 10k BTC was moved by culprits and could be implicit sell-side liquidity since they transferred 0.6 of their means to exchanges. ”
Also, he prompted the HitBTC platform to suspend the sale of these unidentified accounts to put a hold on further selling of these Bitcoins.